By Manal Aboelata
September 19, 2013
Originally posted at Frying Pan News
One in four adolescents in California-nearly one million-aren't getting as much physical activity as they need to maintain a healthy weight. When a young Latino child living in a highly industrialized community gets out to play, how much good does that physical activity do her growing lungs if she's inhaling a toxic soup of air pollution and greenhouse gases? What if she is more likely to get struck by a speeding car than she is to benefit from a lifetime of physical activity? For an African American child who has no nearby park, safe sidewalks or fresh air, there's got to be a better answer.
A constellation of factors in the physical, social, economic and service environment are referred to as the social determinants of health because they have an overwhelming influence on health, quality of life and death rates, as compared to medical care - which is only responsible for 10-15 percent of what determines how healthy we are and how long we live. Nearly two out of every three African Americans, Latinos and people with less than a high school education suffer from unhealthy weight, which increases their lifetime risk of preventable illnesses. Despite overall reductions in some chronic diseases and their risk factors, disparities that unfairly fall upon African Americans, Latinos and low income people have failed to narrow. People in disadvantaged communities - where unemployment rates are chronically high, where public investments are consistently low and where health risks are disproportionately concentrated-must overcome a whole host of barriers to pursue healthy, life-saving behaviors.
Far too many Californians, however, lack access to affordable, accessible options for safe and convenient physical activity because of a history of land-use planning that has both concentrated health and safety risks in some communities and encouraged automobile use to the detriment of safe, efficient pedestrian and bicycle transportation. With a greater understanding of the links between present day land use and health, an increasing economic imperative to improve health and an environmental urgency to be sustainable, we have compelling reasons to invest in solutions that will benefit health and the environment. Fiscal responsibility tells us that California should take steps to become the healthiest state in the nation. To do that, we need to harness all of the tools available to us. Senate Bill 1, sponsored by California Senate Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, represents one critical tool that cities and counties-both rural and urban-could use to create healthy, sustainable and economically thriving development projects.
My sons, two African American boys ages 6 and 8, live in South Los Angeles and attend a local elementary school. We used to drive the kids the 3.1 miles to and from school until a light rail project was built nearby and became operational in 2011. Almost immediately, we became a statistic-the good kind. Just as the data that show that when housing and transportation are designed in such a way that people can walk, they are more likely to do so, our family initiated a new tradition of walking to and from the train as part of our daily commute to school. Now, rain or shine, we get a minimum 40 minutes of physical activity each day, enabled almost entirely by the new rail line.
SB 1 would create a Sustainable Communities Investment Authority "to support development in transit priority project areas and small walkable communities." Moving forward, projects could be conceived and built in ways that are good for climate change and good for health. SB 1 promotes more efficient land-use patterns that would bring down housing and transportation costs by designing in ways that will allow more Californians to walk and bike between home, work and other neighborhood destinations. SB1 would provide a stimulus in suburban, urban and rural communities with a variety of transit projects, including bus corridors, rail or high-speed rail. With smarter planning, more children like my boys will have access to healthier transportation alternatives for years to come.
Creating more walkable communities may be one of the single most important things we can do to create a healthier California. If done well, reduced health care and transportation costs will also mean that more Californians get to hang on to their hard-earned dollars. A recent California-based study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that:
At high but achievable levels of active transport [read as: more walking and biking], risk reduction [from chronic disease]...would rank among the most notable public health achievements in the modern era, reduce the estimated $34 billion in California's annual costs from cardiovascular disease, and other chronic conditions such as obesity, and achieve the U.S. Surgeon General's recommendation that adults engage in 150 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity weekly.
This is a big job. We now know more than ever, that healthy behaviors take root in safe and healthy communities where all people have meaningful opportunities and can engage in safe physical activity, breathe clean air, eat healthy food and live in affordable housing within reasonable distance to good jobs.
We have a real need to create healthy, sustainable communities for all Californians. It's good for our economy and our people. SB 1 could bring us one step closer.
UPDATE: Due to amendments introduced in the Assembly, the bill is going back to the Senate, where sponsor Senator Steinberg plans to hold the bill for the remainder of the legislative session. Advocacy will resume in January 2014.